Turbobike Web Site www.Turborick.com
Ray The 1127 motor has better parts like the rods ,crank, head, transmission etc. I still run 10:1 compression but that isn't the Cr. of choice. I will be going to a 9:1 piston soon. and before you ask about a thicker head gasket that isn't the right way to do it your squish gets to big you want to keep that at .050 in >Rick, >I've checked the compression ratio between the 1052's and the 1127's. The >compression ratio for the 1052 is 9.7:1 and the 1127 is 10:1. From our last >chat you recommended a engine with a 8:1 or a 9:1 ratio, yet you say the 1127 >is a better motor. I know the 1127 has more torque, but I would like to have a >turbo charge that won't be so harsh on the engine and at the same time will >let me be beat the tires off those new bikes on the sprint tracks. Can you >please clarify this for me? Thanks >Soon to be a fellow turbo charger, >Ray > >